Palingenesis, Seeds in the Wind
IN CONSTRUCTION…
Are you suggesting that although only reminiscences remain, we cannot but notice the similarities between the Palingenesis – and perhaps Metempsychosis – of humans and that of metals?
An alchemist cannot fail to notice at least three similarities: the belief that in the mineral salts of human bones lies the residual spark for the “reconstruction” of the individual; the final intervention of the world of sound; the idea that an intact metal experiences the death of its soul as when it is reduced to its Prima Materia (or death of the metal) its soul experiences the end of its corporeal integrity has so many similarities with Heraclitusʼ idea that we experience the death of souls as souls experience our death.
6 What then are we to think of the further ancients’ sophistication in diluting the block of the “animistic field” into many densities and offshoots…
This ancient idea goes beyond the modern granite belief in the separation between consciousness and objects.
7 Alchemists speak of connecting “mediums”…
For alchemists, the secret of everything lies in the “connections” and the substances that compose them.
8 Perhaps what the alchemists called “light”?
So do we want to go back to introducing the anatomy of an alchemical machine? If you want, step back to Alchemy & Light, Introduction. But then you’ll come to the page dedicated to “death”.
12 Could we translate the word “transmutation” as increase and decrease when invisible bodies are reunited and separated?
This seems like a topic that should be further developed in The Subtlety of the Exact Proportions. It is undeniable, however, that death and rebirth have to do with generation and corruption, condensation and rarefaction, almost like a metal.
15 There is always the problem of ritual “regeneration”. As long as it is a metal…
The seed/spark must be somehow amplified into a ray, and the practice, as far as metals are concerned, is highly “disrespectful”: they are killed. It is clear that palingenesis and metempsychosis of biological beings could not be so crude.
21 So, the alchemists began to bring “nature” into play…
In fact, the alchemists began to think that the very few successes of resurrection from biological ashes were due to chance, but since chance does not exist, to nature.
22 What could “nature” provide that the alchemists did not know?
Nature could provide the exact proportions between sky and earth. Which the alchemist called “proportions” between fixed and volatile. But which in reality was not a chemical proportion. See The Subtlety of the Exact Proportions.
23 At this point, we need to understand what alchemists mean by “nature”…
We can only say that alchemists see “nature” as something not fleeting, but flowing. And this makes a world of difference. Note that I wrote “nature” in quotation marks. If I had meant generic nature, I wouldn’t have done so.
27 In support of some inexplicable resurrections, the alchemists used to cite the alchemical “light”…
28 Or even exact proportions that most alchemists did not know…
As we shall see in The Subtlety of the Exact Proportions, the search for the measures was not chemical – which would not have been impossible to discover with a little practice – but physical, in the sense of ritual. In fact, it was about the exact proportions between “Sky” and “Earth”. Where, by sky we mean a symbol of the element fire and by earth a symbol of the element water. We’ll see what this is about later.
33 It is quite clear here that biology only comes into play at a later stage. First, something happens that an alchemist can only call “movement”…
In fact, to resurrect a corpse from the grave, even metallic, at least an embryo will be needed.
36 The ancients spoke of “libations” to resurrect the dead…
Here, a sacred libation cannot be read as an ordinary salt.
37 Did the ancients also speak between the lines when they officiated “libations” to revive some cult statues?
I am convinced that some form of water, however, had to be present at the ceremony.
38 So, let’s imagine that the Egyptian rites of “god-making” were not so far from certain strange and “ethereal” sprinklings of dry water that did not wet the hands.
It has been handed down to us that the Egyptian rituals of “making a god” also included rites of “opening the mouth”. As we can see, this is far from the work of obtaining the resurrection of a metal.
39 But let’s go back to our embryo: How many times have we read the definition of “metallic embryo” in baroque treatises, without asking ourselves the slightest question?
We were taught that the Mercurius, obtained after exhausting volatilizations (in the humid path) or after dangerous fusions and separations (in the metallurgical path) contained within itself the embryo of the raw metal or earth. At most we were able to guess what it was in the transmutation phase (see Transmutation of Metals).
40 At most, we could call this “embryo” Prima Materia, first matter, and understand the difference with Materia Prima (the Latin materia prima is untranslatable, because raw matter is not appropriate)…
It is beginning to become clear that the Prima Materia is a set of different factors, which are able to convey a “message”.
41 Is it true that alchemists often identified gold as the Prima Materia of metals?
Many alchemists did not identify gold with the Prima Materia of metals, but with the seed of metals. In fact, for them, the transmutation of common metals into gold was equivalent to a sowing. See Transmutation of Metals.
42 What is Ariadne’s thread that leads the initiate Theseus out of the labyrinth?
It is difficult to think that Ariadne’s thread was made of tangible matter, when the initiate who had to enter the labyrinth (in this case, Theseus) could not be made of tangible matter other than the wind. The Mysteries of Demeter say: No one can enter the labyrinth with the body, but only in the form of wind.
43 Can we decipher the symbol of Ariadne’s thread as something that is in our memory and must never be forgotten?
Yet when we are born, we forget everything. Unless… we get the help of someone’s memory, which is not us of course.
46 The ancients said that under the influence of music the soul can’t not move…
There is little else to add to this statement. One might only wonder whether “music” and “soul” should be taken literally or whether there is a whole range of analogies. In any case, a beautiful union.
47 Is it true that in many ancient resurrection/preservation rituals great importance was given to sound?
Not only was great importance given to sound, but also great attention was paid to the perpetuation of details of sound tonality. Some of these rituals were performed on exact imitations.
Previous:
Next: